Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35(04): 288-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1389101
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical Use of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition with Children Who Are Deaf

Deborah Mood
1   Child Development Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
,
Aaron Shield
2   Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 October 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2) was administered to eight children who are deaf and who are native American Sign Language (ASL) users with previous autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. Classification on two different module selection criteria was compared based on: (1) standardized administration rules (signs not counted as equivalent to words) and (2) commonly utilized clinical administration (sign language complexity treated equivalently to spoken language complexity). Differential module selection resulted in discrepant classification in five of the eight cases (63%) and suggests that ADOS-2 via standardized test administration may result in a failure to identify autism among children who are deaf with primary communication in ASL. Two of the eight children (25%) did not exceed the cutoff for an ASD classification on either module administered despite previous ASD diagnosis. Overall results suggest that caution should be used when utilizing the ADOS-2 with children who are deaf who primarily communicate using ASL.